Zur Seitennavigation oder mit Tastenkombination für den accesskey-Taste und Taste 1 
Zum Seiteninhalt oder mit Tastenkombination für den accesskey und Taste 2 
Startseite    Anmelden     
Sommer 2024    Hilfe  Trennstrich  Sitemap  Trennstrich  Impressum  Trennstrich  Datenschutz  Trennstrich  node2  Trennstrich  Switch to english language

Publikation: Zeitschriftenartikel

Neglected geriatric assessment and overtreatment of older patients with pancreatic cancer


Grunddaten

Titel Neglected geriatric assessment and overtreatment of older patients with pancreatic cancer
Untertitel results from a prospective phase IV clinical trial
Erscheinungsjahr 2022
Seiten (von – bis) 662 – 666
Band 13
Heft-Nr. 5
Jahr 2022
Publikationsform Elektronische Ressource
Publikationsart Zeitschriftenartikel
Sprache Englisch
DOI 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.12.018
Letzte Änderung 14.07.2022 06:01:59
Bearbeitungsstatus durch UB Rostock abschließend validiert
Dauerhafte URL http://purl.uni-rostock.de/fodb/pub/68270
Links zu Katalogen Diese Publikation in der Universitätsbibliographie Diese Publikation im GBV-Katalog

Abstract

Background - Older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer may suffer increased toxicity from intensive chemotherapy. Treatment individualization by geriatric assessment (GA) might improve functional outcome. - Methods - We performed a multicenter, phase IV, open label trial in patients 70 years with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients underwent GA and were assigned to one of three categories based on their scores: Go-Go, Slow-Go, or Frail. These categories were intended to guide physician's treatment decisions when choosing to treat patients with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (arm A), gemcitabine (arm B), or best supportive care (arm C). Primary objective was a stable (loss of five points or less) Barthel's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score during chemotherapy; secondary endpoints included GA scores during therapy, safety, quality of life, response and survival rates. - Results - Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the trial in six centers in Germany (out of 135 planned), resulting in termination due to low recruitment. Fifteen patients were allocated to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, fifteen to gemcitabine, and two to best supportive care by their physicians, although according to their GA scores 29 patients (91%) were categorized as Slow-Go and three (9%) as Go-Go. Thus, fifteen of 32 (47%) patients were misclassified and given a course of treatment inconsistent with their GA scores. Median progression-free survival (PFS) were 3.3 months and 9.1 months and median time to quality-of-life deterioration 13 days and 29 days in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy arms, respectively. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 (78.6%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and 8 (53.3%) patients in the gemcitabine arm. - Conclusions - Clinical evaluations by investigators differed markedly from geriatric assessments, leading to potential overtreatment. In our modest sample size study, those patients undergoing more intensive therapy had a less favorable course.

Autoren

Betge, Johannes
Schulte, Nadine
Belle, Sebastian
Zhan, Tianzuo
Krammer-Steiner, Beate
Moulin, Jean-Charles
Kleiß, Matthias
Lammert, Frank
Wedding, Ulrich
Räth, Sebastian
Maenz, Martin
Hegele, Lisa
Larcher-Senn, Julian
Jesenofsky, Ralf
Ebert, Matthias
Härtel, Nicolai

Einrichtung

UMR/ZIM/Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III